Grand Parkway is by developers, for developers
A few days ago, the Chron ran a (fawning) Q & A with the Gulf Coast Institute's David Crossley, and if we set aside most of the New Urbanism dreaming, he did make a good observation:
Q: Do you have the sense that Houston will get greener?
A: I think for five or 10 years we will lose massive amounts of green space, but I think at some point we will stop. There are 10 years of projects in the hopper and those projects are horrible; they are beyond belief and they are going up so fast they will probably devour as much as 1,000 square miles of land in the 10 to 15 years. But a lot of people are saying wait a minute, we don't have to accept that. We don't have to build those things. ... Of course if we don't build the Grand Parkway, most of that stuff doesn't happen. If we do build the Grand Parkway, all of it happens.
Q: So the Grand Parkway [a proposed 180 or so miles of highway circling greater Houston, a portion of which has already been built] is the great evil?
A: Actually it is. It's the worst project on the table. It is not a transportation project. If you look at the map of where it goes, no people live there. ... It is putting a road in rural places and saying, "Now you can go develop subdivisions."
Something we agree on! To elaborate on his statement that it's not a transportation project, but it IS a developers' project, the Grand Parkway was tabled decades ago as unnecessary for mobility, then brought back to life by developers (Billy Burge is president of the Grand Parkway Association) who see it as a golden opportunity to build subdivisions and retail centers.
Posted by Anne Linehan @ 10/28/07 12:23 PM | Houston Transit | Technorati | Sphere | Comments (7)
Previous Entry | Home | Next Entry
Trackback
Unfortunately, abusive spammers have forced us to disable incoming trackback pings. The Technorati link should list related posts. Feel free to drop us an email if you've linked a post and would like to let us know about it.
