Mysterious movie reviewing criteria
Eric Harrison has the top story in today's "star" section, listing what he considers to be 2004's best movies, and he includes this sentence:
It's as if the furor over The Passion of the Christ, Fahrenheit 9/11 and the presidential election sucked up all the energy.
It caught my eye because Harrison achieved a moment of celebrity in the blogosphere with his reviews of those two movies. The Beautiful Atrocities blog compared what movie reviewers wrote about Fahrenheit 9/11 with what those same reviewers wrote about The Passion of the Christ. Here is Harrison's entry:
Eric Harrison, Houston Chronicle:
F9/11: (Moore) is an indispensable treasure, and his imperfections are part of the reason, because they mark him as real.
Passion: It's awful because everything he knows about storytelling has been swept aside by proselytizing zeal.
Harrison even made James Taranto's Best of the Web. Congratulations!
Posted by Anne Linehan @ 12/30/04 08:50 AM | Houston Chronicle | Technorati | Sphere | Comments (0)
Previous Entry | Home | Next Entry
Trackback
Unfortunately, abusive spammers have forced us to disable incoming trackback pings. The Technorati link should list related posts. Feel free to drop us an email if you've linked a post and would like to let us know about it.
