Richmond rail line voted down before
Rad Sallee's Move It! column today says that Richmond Avenue rail is not a new idea. It was first proposed back in the early 1980s, but ran into problems:
Retired architect Edward "Ted" Richardson dropped by last week with some interesting reading: two environmental impact statements that the Metropolitan Transit Authority produced in the early 1980s for what it then called the "Southwest/Westpark corridor."
[snip]
An interesting sidelight to today's debate: Both street-level light rail as a transit mode, and Richmond as a route, were ruled out. The 1980 draft environmental statement says light rail would cause "severe traffic disruption on major cross streets and operate at relatively low speed."
And guess what? A vote was held:
Voters turned down that plan by a scorching 62 percent to 38 percent. Two decades later, by contrast, they approved — narrowly — the plan that's binding now.
Ahhh, but voters did not approve a Richmond rail line in 2003. They (barely) approved (they thought) a Westpark rail line. Perhaps we now see why Metro didn't put Richmond language on the 2003 ballot.
Posted by Anne Linehan @ 04/24/06 09:25 AM | Houston Transit | Technorati | Sphere | Comments (6)
Previous Entry | Home | Next Entry
Trackback
Unfortunately, abusive spammers have forced us to disable incoming trackback pings. The Technorati link should list related posts. Feel free to drop us an email if you've linked a post and would like to let us know about it.
ADVERTISING
DISCLAIMER
All content © 2004-08, blogHOUSTON and the respective authors.
blogHOUSTON.net is powered by Nucleus.
Site design and Nucleus customization are by Kevin Whited.