Chron: Public can't form opinion on Rove, but we can!
Yesterday, the Chronicle editorial board weighed in on the Plame/Wilson/Beltway Media Insiders affair:
For every revelation concerning the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson, it seems, there are at least two unanswered questions. Until more answers are known, the public cannot form a valid opinion on the culpability of Karl Rove or anyone else in the White House.
The editorialists then opine on the matter for another 500+ words.
Sedosi Alhambra writes:
So the public is too dumb to form an opinon, but Mrs. White [the editorialists] can write a seemingly authoritative opinion piece on the situation? They first say "who knows" and then go about explaining why Rove is guilty....
He has further thoughts on the substance of the rest of the editorial.
Additionally, I would just offer up a query as to whether the editorialists even bother to read their editorials for internal consistency, because that first paragraph suggests otherwise.
Posted by Kevin Whited @ 07/23/05 02:38 PM | Houston Chronicle | Technorati | Sphere | Comments (2)
Previous Entry | Home | Next Entry
Trackback
Unfortunately, abusive spammers have forced us to disable incoming trackback pings. The Technorati link should list related posts. Feel free to drop us an email if you've linked a post and would like to let us know about it.
ADVERTISING
DISCLAIMER
All content © 2004-09, blogHOUSTON and the respective authors.
blogHOUSTON.net is powered by Nucleus.
Site design and Nucleus customization are by Kevin Whited.