Both assertions cannot be true
Earlier this week, Chronicle columnist John Lopez wrote the following:
When the offseason began and the Astros' front office held meetings trying to determine which players would be worth the expense, the list was narrowed to four. Soriano was at the top, a clear No. 1 target. Next came Jermaine Dye, a restricted free agent, then Aramis Ramirez and [Carlos] Lee.
Today, Drayton McClane cheerleader Jesus Ortiz posted the following to his blog:
Tim Purpura has worked his butt off negotiating to land Carlos Lee, who actually was the Astros' top target this winter even though some teams considered Alfonso Soriano better.
Both of these assertions cannot be true.
I wonder whose version is right?
Posted by Kevin Whited @ 11/24/06 01:46 PM | Print | Comments (1)
Trackback
Unfortunately, abusive spammers have forced us to disable incoming trackback pings. The Technorati link should list related posts. Feel free to drop us an email if you've linked a post and would like to let us know about it.